Nineteen Eleven

Kid be trollin' cause they get destroyed in debates. Same ol' shit. Getwrecked.

Thanks for the avatar, but can you change it to team edward? I really don't like dogs/wolves or anything of the sort.
edit :WOW this one is really good, better than anything I could cook up. TY.

dorraj wrote:Charr, do you want to murder people? you're a **** ****.

Has nothing to do with the thread. Don't know you. Don't want to. Go back to your greaseCave. mad.

hahah brother, this is a complicated scenario...

let me explain further - we had a player who played his first match this season.. the majority of the community knows who he is, and even players on your team. People know he didn't do this to gain any advantage, and it happened because he joined a ...

The rules aren't guidelines or suggestions. They are rules. Also, the part about admins handling each case individually sort of implies that they will do so under complicated scenarios. I thought it to be painfully obvious, but since you keep insisting that it is something completely different, I ...

The admin who handled the first case FOLLOWED THE RULES EXACTLY. The admin who handled the second case IGNORED THE RULES COMPLETELY. Done being confused? k. <- that is my entire argument. You will either respond to that, or not at all. I'm done stomping on your confused, delusional brain.
Funny ...

huh? Is there a difference between two different players rating? One had 7500, the other had 7500. One was on our team, one was on an admin's team. Hmm.. See where I'm going with this? The admin who handled the first case FOLLOWED THE RULES EXACTLY. The admin who handled the second case IGNORED THE ...

There is no reason to treat them differently. Simply referring to the rules would suffice in both cases. It's so elementary it **** hurts. How many times do I need to say it? The **** are exactly the same. Someone. Rated. **** right over your head.
Right. One match, in regular season, you lose by ...

You're escaping my point. The rules are very clear on what happens when you rate. These rules were not upheld. Why would TPG be taken seriously if they can simply change each rule whenever they please? Your argument is completely unrealistic and is off-topic really.
Oh. My. ****. Goodness.

1 ...

They didn't have someone cheating for sure, he just didn't record one half.

You're escaping my point, which is funny to see. Don't squirm from the truth, bro. You lost a match by an unbelievably narrow margin and STILL broke the rules, thus got your FF loss. Whereas vs. MVPz you lost by a much ...