Charr wrote:Why the **** would anyone care about "reputation" over a game where people attack others for their own rule breaking? Lol. You're angry, bad at video games, and ignore your girlfriend. You're such a great person.
dear MVP
Re: dear MVP
Re: dear MVP
Tell you what. You explain how it matters, and I'll check the SS. I was actually referring to that case as one that the admins handled correctly. I'm a little curious why you'd bring that one up?alex kirk wrote:Dear Char,Charr wrote:Why the **** would anyone care about "reputation" over a game where people attack others for their own rule breaking? Lol. You're angry, bad at video games, and ignore your girlfriend. You're such a great person.
Confirm or deny the following: the match in which you received an ff loss you LOST by a single digit number of points before even receiving said FF loss.
A simple "true" or "false" will do.
Thanks,
Future LogicLand resident
Re: dear MVP
this thread = 
-
squatta_leader
- Admin
- Posts: 2913
- Joined: Sun Jun 30, 2002 3:40 pm
- Clans: cXt, blacksheep, 45th, a0tp, 63rd, devil^, em0, ubad, sssx, mvpz, Greasy Dorks.
- Location: Oregon
- Contact:
Re: dear MVP
rymoz wrote:
-
kirk
- Posts: 2436
- Joined: Fri Feb 04, 2011 3:46 pm
- Clans: feat6, aids, x[m], ptm, snowmen, NoGo, GI, 50cal, moNster, te amo, gameslaves, winnfield, koala, iwa
- Contact:
Re: dear MVP
Really? So in one match you lose by less than 10, and in another you lose by 100, and you want me to explain the significance? You want me to tell you how these cases are different?Charr wrote:Tell you what. You explain how it matters, and I'll check the SS. I was actually referring to that case as one that the admins handled correctly. I'm a little curious why you'd bring that one up?
Are you **** stupid?
Re: dear MVP
-I am frustrated, by the lack of educational discussion you want to have on the subject.
-My girlfriend has class early in the morning so ignoring her right now is fine, and explaining this discussion to her tomorrow will make her laugh just as hard as, alex or anyone else (there's a reason why your teammates are not supporting you publicly and you are about to have two banned accounts. even she will get that.) because she will understand it, unlock you seem to be.
-My girlfriend has class early in the morning so ignoring her right now is fine, and explaining this discussion to her tomorrow will make her laugh just as hard as, alex or anyone else (there's a reason why your teammates are not supporting you publicly and you are about to have two banned accounts. even she will get that.) because she will understand it, unlock you seem to be.
Re: dear MVP
Hmm? The one where we both received an FF loss, they had someone cheating. We disputed. for whatever reason, they received 0 points. Our backup player was rating. Everyone on our team thought we should have won. I checked the rules, and said we both should get an FF loss. Sure enough, that's what happened. It was a complex case as far as disputes go...Yet when simple rating disputes arise, there are so many "variables" as you call them, that need to be taken into account. Legit as my shit.alex kirk wrote:Really? So in one match you lose by less than 10, and in another you lose by 100, and you want me to explain the significance? You want me to tell you how these cases are different?Charr wrote:Tell you what. You explain how it matters, and I'll check the SS. I was actually referring to that case as one that the admins handled correctly. I'm a little curious why you'd bring that one up?
Are you **** stupid?
-
Theworst
- Posts: 600
- Joined: Thu Sep 22, 2011 6:44 pm
- Clans: ~Casual // Critical Mass // Exodus // Gentlemens Club // Midwinter // Duality~
- Location: Guelph, ON
Re: dear MVP
Guessing Char is Kyle Allaire.
Kid gets shit on by everyone who plays him, can see why he would dispute over something as stupid as rates.
Kid gets shit on by everyone who plays him, can see why he would dispute over something as stupid as rates.
-
kirk
- Posts: 2436
- Joined: Fri Feb 04, 2011 3:46 pm
- Clans: feat6, aids, x[m], ptm, snowmen, NoGo, GI, 50cal, moNster, te amo, gameslaves, winnfield, koala, iwa
- Contact:
Re: dear MVP
They didn't have someone cheating for sure, he just didn't record one half.Charr wrote:Hmm? The one where we both received an FF loss, they had someone cheating. We disputed. for whatever reason, they received 0 points. Our backup player was rating. Everyone on our team thought we should have won. I checked the rules, and said we both should get an FF loss. Sure enough, that's what happened. It was a complex case as far as disputes go...Yet when simple rating disputes arise, there are so many "variables" as you call them, that need to be taken into account. Legit as my shit.
You're escaping my point, which is funny to see. Don't squirm from the truth, bro. You lost a match by an unbelievably narrow margin and STILL broke the rules, thus got your FF loss. Whereas vs. MVPz you lost by a much larger margin (2 caps...). And you think these two cases are able to be judged THE SAME?
Seriously. SERIOUSLY. THIS is why TPG has the rule where admins treat each case individually, because of idiots like you who interpret every case as being equal. These cases are anything but equal. There are serious inconsistencies between them.
Re: dear MVP
ace having a girlfriend.... 