DOD:S

[greetz]

i wouldnt mind consistently neg repping all of the dod source players posts on 1911 for playing a dumb game , would be fun!

[acetamino]

i wouldnt mind consistently neg repping all of the dod source players posts on 1911 for playing a dumb game , would be fun!

yup, i wouldnt mind them on the forums as long as they couldnt have rep power ever.

[squatta_leader]

If we move forward with any plans to have Source on 1911, we'll have a poll open so people can vote. I'm not going to open it up if its just going to be a huge flame fest.

[AlopeX]

If we move forward with any plans to have Source on 1911, we'll have a poll open so people can vote. I'm not going to open it up if its just going to be a huge flame fest.

what on 1911 isn't a huge flame fest? That is the true question.

[t`RavE]

If we move forward with any plans to have Source on 1911, we'll have a poll open so people can vote. I'm not going to open it up if its just going to be a huge flame fest.

[Rob]

WHAT THE ****. Did that dude die???

[scorch-]

Why would anyone want to talk about that stupid game? Nothing's stopping them from talking about random shit and DoD.

[rehpyc]

Source has been falling apart first because the game is frustrating to play, and second because the community they had (and maybe still have on a much smaller scale?) was pretty awful. The only benefit in adding the community here would be added traffic to the site (is it needed?).

[Rob]

Source blows but what's the harm in letting them have their own sub-forum or something. Throw in another TPG division, give one or two of them admin control over it, and let it flourish or fail.

Seems like a low cost-high benefit situation. If the Source kids **** up the opportunity, then it's no loss to Sears or Narc or anyone in 1.3. If they make the most of it, the communities are both a little bit stronger by way of combining community and competitive hubs.

[k4b00m]

on Gotfrag everyone was just flaming eachothers forum back and forth lol.