rippeR wrote:to be fair: If people believe that FloYd is innocent, all they have to/can do is to convince the rest/the admins with explaining scenes step for step.
But that would be far too objective for the most dorks here. Better start flaming and posting gifs
I skipped the last 8 pages because I can't understand half of what is being said here. This is the first post I saw afterwards.alex kirk wrote:I understand maybe 35% of this thread.
Has this cheater played against jules winnfield yet? That's the ultimate litmus test for cheating.
u re unbrain for understands that?stealthlol wrote:I skipped the last 8 pages because I can't understand half of what is being said here.
Ok, one last time: WE ONLY BAN BASED OFF DEMOS. The decision is a vote made by all the admins of that country's league. There was evidence that was presented, and we banned based off that. The lack of comprehension is mind boggling.nik wrote:about the way this is being handled..
This is how it always happened, also in Europe. I remember back in the day people being banned from clanbase without any proof being given to other people.
Later on there was no really good anticheat in europe (none atleast that covered all the good leagues) and people could just hack or buy a cheap new account. The stin cheatkids videos etc were I believe a result of ridiculing being a bigger punishment than a ban at the time. This also lead to this public trial sort of thing. This happens in the absense of (good) anti-cheat.
So the way tpg handles thisreally isn't that weird.
Piojo wrote:-sF Rep- Ken wrote:Floyds wallhack is so good he can see through the Maginot Line
Most Germans can see through the Maginot Line
On this logic Floyd = Blank
Conspiracy solved.
-
Toxinator that they have the similar play style, not mean they are the same person... Them can explain when Eus played vs fnaps and the 2 players are on the same match?
Blank/kalle - German - fnaps
floyd - France - EuS
EDIT. i dont defend anyone, just clarify the situation
Where did I say anything that said otherwise? I was just pointing out that it is normal for leagues to not make the proof public. Public trials are usually just for the amusement of others. And I don't remember how this worked on gotfrag, but zp! used to ban topics that posted cheatervideo's.ward wrote:Ok, one last time: WE ONLY BAN BASED OFF DEMOS. The decision is a vote made by all the admins of that country's league. There was evidence that was presented, and we banned based off that. The lack of comprehension is mind boggling.nik wrote:about the way this is being handled..
This is how it always happened, also in Europe. I remember back in the day people being banned from clanbase without any proof being given to other people.
Later on there was no really good anticheat in europe (none atleast that covered all the good leagues) and people could just hack or buy a cheap new account. The stin cheatkids videos etc were I believe a result of ridiculing being a bigger punishment than a ban at the time. This also lead to this public trial sort of thing. This happens in the absense of (good) anti-cheat.
So the way tpg handles thisreally isn't that weird.
