KTEdorraj wrote:Go central, and please avoid NFO. There seems to be enough NFO servers around; they have super questionable registration.
server hosting
-
squatta_leader
- Admin
- Posts: 2913
- Joined: Sun Jun 30, 2002 3:40 pm
- Clans: cXt, blacksheep, 45th, a0tp, 63rd, devil^, em0, ubad, sssx, mvpz, Greasy Dorks.
- Location: Oregon
- Contact:
Re: server hosting
Re: server hosting
Absolutely, shitty game.Sears wrote:KTEdorraj wrote:Go central, and please avoid NFO. There seems to be enough NFO servers around; they have super questionable registration.
-
Gorillabc
- Posts: 314
- Joined: Sun Sep 30, 2012 9:58 pm
- Clans: BOMMERCOON MNM n2p skull nwp GI cNg rSports dicE AIDS FD kbc stoss dth SSSX THATMYDICK Fx 151 etc
- Location: ON THE OTHER SIDE OF **** EGYPT
Re: server hosting
I like my Dallas NFO. It's supposed to be 500 fps, and you have to pay $14.99/month more to get 1000. It runs at 995-1000 fps constantly even without paying the extra. I've never had any complaints on it about ping or registration. Plus it's only $11.69/month with a free HLTV & ulimited webhosting.
-
Jakimo
- Posts: 526
- Joined: Fri May 06, 2011 1:50 am
- Clans: l2r . , Jim's|, FurY, ( s )ttR., sQ, HH, vVv
Re: server hosting
im a fan of my NFO chicago. not too many ppl whine about it. the ones that do usually wind up gettng tpg banned within the same week of bitching. so its all good.
she used to be NY, and was just ill, everything hit. me and snoops had 7 to 20 ping. now in chicago its more like 30 to 40. the reg has however changed over time. ive noticed they are indeed all made differently. im going to try starting a new contract and see if theres a difference.
she used to be NY, and was just ill, everything hit. me and snoops had 7 to 20 ping. now in chicago its more like 30 to 40. the reg has however changed over time. ive noticed they are indeed all made differently. im going to try starting a new contract and see if theres a difference.