breakin' through

[tenks]

p.s. Why bother arguing over who the 2nd best rookie QB was last season? Seems pointless. I guess, once you add in Luck, you're actually looking at a race for 3rd.

| actually don't see anyone arguing that topic in this thread.


But I will entertain it... lets see what kap does with 16 games, thanks.

[Todo]

There seems to be a pretty clear implicit Kaep vs. Wilson argument going on. Just figured I'd chime in to keep those two in check, somewhere near the back of the line in rookie QB ranking.

As for the sunglasses, everyone wears them TO the awards. Don't step up to the mic with them on. That's universal.

[Fleener]

Kaepernick wasn't a rookie last season

Also, only one of the three rookie qb's have a playoff win. But, no reason to argue whose better, I'll let the season do the talking.

[Todo]

Kaepernick wasn't a rookie last season

FINE. FOR ALL INTENTS AND PURPOSES.

As for the whole "winning" thing, irrelevant. Would have been interesting if RGIII were backed by an elite defense instead of, ya know, a bad one.

[Todo]

Also, come on, defending sunglasses while accepting an award? This should be universal. Be respectful.

[crawtona]

Also, come on, defending sunglasses while accepting an award? This should be universal. Be respectful.

Sometimes, I wear my sunglasses at night. I do that so that i can weave, and potentially, breathe your story lines. I also do it so I can keep track of the visions I have in my eyes. So don't be hating on the shades, man.

[tenks]

Wait you just said wins was not a determining factor in who's a better QB?

Yea, I'm done.

[Todo]

Wait you just said wins was not a determining factor in who's a better QB?

Yea, I'm done.

Probably for the best. You're ignoring a MINIMUM of 50% of the game and it's leading to poor discourse.

[crawtona]

Wait you just said wins was not a determining factor in who's a better QB?

Yea, I'm done.

Dammit, tenks, making me get all serious: teams determine wins. Who is actually the better QB gets way too **** complicated for any of you nerds to actually determine objectively. If a QB throws 100% accurate passes, but his receivers blow ass, can't make a catch, and they lose a bunch of games because of it, are they a terrible quarterback? Negatory. I don't give a shit about this QB mental masturbation exercise (seveN already won the thread), but bring it out of the bush-league on the logic front.

[tenks]

Also, come on, defending sunglasses while accepting an award? This should be universal. Be respectful.