Page 2 of 6
Re: DOD:S
Posted: Mon Mar 19, 2012 8:22 pm
by squatta_leader
If the source community wants a TPG division, get someone to be admin for it, and hit up Narc.
If the source community wants to talk about having a space on 1911, then have someone who isn't cass contact me so I don't have to deal with the ridiculous game of telephone via the forums.
AMATEUR HOUR
Re: DOD:S
Posted: Mon Mar 19, 2012 8:44 pm
by cassinoroyale
ApatiK wrote:Oh hahah Cass probably mistyped and said Narc but gave me Sears's profile and then when I spoke to Pande I said it was Narc instead of Sears. My bad!
When you PM'd me about that DODS thingy I explained that
1911 is ran by
Sears and that you would need his approval for bringing dods community here. After I PM'd him about 1911 accomodating the source community, Eric asked me to contact you directly so I sent you his profile.
I remember I suggested you to ask
Narc about the possibility of a DODS division in
TPG, what I even further added that it'd be a longshot that could worth the try. My english is broken, yeah, I'm sure I haven't mistyped anything.
Sears wrote:
If the source community wants a TPG division, get someone to be admin for it, and hit up Narc.
If the source community wants to talk about having a space on 1911, then have someone who isn't cass contact me so I don't have to deal with the ridiculous game of telephone via the forums.
AMATEUR HOUR
Why you are b(f)laming me if all that I did was introduce apatik to you? It's not my fault if the guy made a confusion between your and narc role in the community. Jezzz...
Re: DOD:S
Posted: Mon Mar 19, 2012 8:49 pm
by Rambizzle
I don't see why not... the more traffic the better.
Re: DOD:S
Posted: Mon Mar 19, 2012 9:01 pm
by t`RavE
cassinoroyale wrote:Why you are b(f)laming me if all that I did was introduce apatik to you? It's not my fault if the guy made a confusion between your and narc role in the community. Jezzz...
Re: DOD:S
Posted: Mon Mar 19, 2012 9:03 pm
by ApatiK
I'm sorry Cass I might have been the one that actually made the mistake by misreading. So yeah I made the confusion and I'll contact the good person in the future regarding this matter.
Again, I'm sorry for all the troubles!
Re: DOD:S
Posted: Mon Mar 19, 2012 9:06 pm
by squatta_leader
I wasn't blaming you brosef. I was just saying that so far, this process of the Source community approaching me has come from a 1911 pm from you (telephone), and then this thread (even more retarded telephone).
HOW HAS NO ONE CONTACTED ME DIRECTlLY AND EXPLAINED WTF IS UP?
AMATEUR HOUR.
Re: DOD:S
Posted: Mon Mar 19, 2012 9:47 pm
by pande
Really...
Re: DOD:S
Posted: Mon Mar 19, 2012 9:55 pm
by squatta_leader
Re: DOD:S
Posted: Mon Mar 19, 2012 9:58 pm
by badnewspanda
whoa hi pande!
Re: DOD:S
Posted: Mon Mar 19, 2012 10:01 pm
by pande
badnewspanda wrote:whoa hi pande!
whoa, hi!
