later dork [NSFW]

All things KTP League.
CharlieGiteau
Posts: 1331
Joined: Mon May 09, 2011 12:49 am
Clans: solidworks, pUr/fp^, gddLam, TeamLess, [38th], NB
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Contact:

Re: later dork [NSFW]

Post by CharlieGiteau »

Blrsm wrote:Charlie, lay off crank. I'm in vent with him every day on his team. If he cheated, he'd have a support ticket from me faster that you'd be able to get the demo. Not because i don't like the guy, but because I've told everyone in vent that I'm tired of playing against/with cheaters. So, if you think anyone on vVv cheats, you don't really have to worry, I'll dispute them myself.
And I've told each and everyone one of them about it. Now please stop the bickering, act like gentlemen and shake each others hands.
Read the thread, idiot. He admitted he's cheated in pubs, which was what I eluded to the entire time. You'd also realize that I said he clearly wasn't cheating in matches, yet. He's a big boy, we don't need your assistance.

Also, Crafty is hitting the nail on the head. Nicholson saying he got them from Crank is nothing but hearsay. I have no clue how TPG could ban someone for distributing cheats when there isn't really a way to prove it without an admission to it. Although, makes sense now that he's admitted to having them.

BTW, lol at you cheating in CS pubs. Thanks to Crafty for making you look like a hypocritical idiot without any effort from myself.
Polak
Posts: 625
Joined: Wed Mar 23, 2011 10:22 pm
Clans: online thunder

Re: later dork [NSFW]

Post by Polak »

CraftyDus wrote:
Blrsm wrote:...because I've told everyone in vent that I'm tired of playing against/with cheaters.
Image

You were running around cs pubs w/ out walls aimbotting and speedhacking with Nicholson just a few days ago, and banned dbo from our vent for making fun of you dorks for it.
Your attempts at dressing down cheaters by talking shit is laughable. /tpgban2.0

As far as I'm concerned, Crank isn't culpable in anyway for Nicholson's choices.

As for this:

"§7.8 Distribution of Cheats

Distribution of cheats shall be considered the same as cheating and will carry the same punishment as cheating. This includes linking/hosting/sharing cheats in any public or private setting. Cheats are defined as any third party program, script, or SOUNDPACK that aids in the playing of Day of Defeat."


Image



There are some real issues with proving, enforcing, and justifying it.
Equating it with a one year cheater ban is also difficult to understand.
I would've loved to hear the discussion that predicated this rule's adoption.

Many of the really good dod movies utilize the cheats as a visual tool.
Thoroughly scrutinizing player submitted demos as a pub admin, TPG captain etc., is made profoundly easier and are argueably legitimate uses.
Making file sharing a bannable offense might just be a step too far... :?:
http://nineteeneleven.org/forums/viewto ... f=5&t=3605
Post Reply