Page 16 of 34
Re: dear MVP
Posted: Wed Nov 02, 2011 2:07 am
by kirk
Charr wrote:We were told to replay the match, as Tox stated. Taylor was trying to mend the situation.
Narc told us "Rules are Rules" when we had a player accidentally rating, so that's what we told him when his team told us to let it slide.
You should at least get your facts straight before storming in here like a 6 year old on a sugar high, making little to no sense at all. You just seem to skim through things and misinterpret nearly everything that is right in front of your face. Very tragic if you have this disability in the real world.
I guess you conveniently missed all the posts that stated
TPG ADMINS TREAT EACH CASE INDIVIDUALLY AND INDEPENDENT OF OTHER CASES BASED ON DIFFERENT VARIABLES.
The match where your team rated was different from this match. You're comparing two things with INCONSISTENT variables. THAT is the most illogical thing anyone has done in this thread. Brb comparing and equating apples to oranges. Brb LogicLand. Brb herp derp.
Also missing this part (again):
§8 Disclaimer
TPG admins reserve the right to make independent judgement calls for any rule as necessary. These judgement calls, if made, will supersede any current rules listed above.
Re: dear MVP
Posted: Wed Nov 02, 2011 2:09 am
by Charr
alex kirk wrote:Charr wrote:We were told to replay the match, as Tox stated. Taylor was trying to mend the situation.
Narc told us "Rules are Rules" when we had a player accidentally rating, so that's what we told him when his team told us to let it slide.
You should at least get your facts straight before storming in here like a 6 year old on a sugar high, making little to no sense at all. You just seem to skim through things and misinterpret nearly everything that is right in front of your face. Very tragic if you have this disability in the real world.
I guess you conveniently missed all the posts that stated
TPG ADMINS TREAT EACH CASE INDIVIDUALLY AND INDEPENDENT OF OTHER CASES BASED ON DIFFERENT VARIABLES.
The match where your team rated was different from this match. You're comparing two things with INCONSISTENT variables. THAT is the most illogical thing anyone has done in this thread. Brb comparing and equating apples to oranges. Brb LogicLand. Brb herp derp.
Also missing this part (again):
§8 Disclaimer
TPG admins reserve the right to make independent judgement calls for any rule as necessary. These judgement calls, if made, will supersede any current rules listed above.
REINFORCING MY POINT. Yet again. Admins following rules in one scenario, and not in another. God dammit, how are you this stupid?
Re: dear MVP
Posted: Wed Nov 02, 2011 2:11 am
by toxinatoR
Charr wrote:
You should at least get your facts straight before storming in here like a 6 year old on a sugar high, making little to no sense at all. You just seem to skim through things and misinterpret nearly everything that is right in front of your face. Very tragic if you have this disability in the real world.
Re: dear MVP
Posted: Wed Nov 02, 2011 2:12 am
by Charr
@ alex
According to you, admins should just punish people based on their mood. **** makes a lot of sense. The rules are on the website for a reason. They are to be taken seriously. If a complication arises, sure let the admin try to handle it. Mend the situation. You're just saying "OH THEY CAN DO WHAT THEY WANT, WHEN THEY WANT. DERPDERP". Sounds **** illogical and ridiculous.
Re: dear MVP
Posted: Wed Nov 02, 2011 2:13 am
by kirk
Charr wrote:REINFORCING MY POINT. Yet again. Admins following rules in one scenario, and not in another. God dammit, how are you this stupid?
If the variables were different between these cases, then you have no **** point.
Is it that difficult to understand? The **** regarding your past match =/= the **** regarding this previous match.
Does this simple statement make sense? Or...? Let me know if you can understand that. Because I have my doubts.
Re: dear MVP
Posted: Wed Nov 02, 2011 2:14 am
by rymoz
Charr wrote:@ alex
According to you, admins should just punish people based on their mood. **** makes a lot of sense. The rules are on the website for a reason. They are to be taken seriously. If a complication arises, sure let the admin try to handle it. Mend the situation. You're just saying "OH THEY CAN DO WHAT THEY WANT, WHEN THEY WANT. DERPDERP". Sounds **** illogical and ridiculous.
Re: dear MVP
Posted: Wed Nov 02, 2011 2:14 am
by nugz`
Charr wrote:@ alex
According to you, admins should just punish people based on their mood. **** makes a lot of sense. The rules are on the website for a reason. They are to be taken seriously. If a complication arises, sure let the admin try to handle it. Mend the situation. You're just saying "OH THEY CAN DO WHAT THEY WANT, WHEN THEY WANT. DERPDERP". Sounds **** illogical and ridiculous.
Re: dear MVP
Posted: Wed Nov 02, 2011 2:14 am
by kirk
Charr wrote:@ alex
According to you, admins should just punish people based on their mood. **** makes a lot of sense. The rules are on the website for a reason. They are to be taken seriously. If a complication arises, sure let the admin try to handle it. Mend the situation. You're just saying "OH THEY CAN DO WHAT THEY WANT, WHEN THEY WANT. DERPDERP". Sounds **** illogical and ridiculous.
Hyperbole is fun, but it only makes you look stupid.
Re: dear MVP
Posted: Wed Nov 02, 2011 2:16 am
by defiance
STOP RESETTING HIS NEG REPS, WE ARE WORKING HARD HERE
Re: dear MVP
Posted: Wed Nov 02, 2011 2:17 am
by nugz`
defiance wrote:STOP RESETTING HIS NEG REPS, WE ARE WORKING HARD HERE