Nineteen Eleven

kngz` wrote:

stealthlol wrote:Except you all knew they wanted to switch servers. So you needed to talk to them about it because...?

because we don't have to do it if we don't want to? don't sit here and try to act like we did something wrong because that **** beaner leroy wanted to be a dickhead.

seaN wrote:Also;

4. We are very understanding and accommodating if you come to us ahead of time. Just last week we agreed to play a match at 3pm est against Jims so that one of their players could play.

Not impressed. Considering you have brothers split amongst those teams.

seaN wrote:

gwolf_ wrote:

seaN wrote:Hella mad? Not really. Just annoyed that there wasn't even a thought given to using our server when someone was pinging over 200 to yours. I don't care that we lost, it just makes me sad that people are still giant douche bags in this community. Sorry for thinking you were anything other than that.

1. You weren't pinging over 200, you were pinging 130.
2. It was YOUR internet, not the server. 3 of us are west coast, 3 of us are east coast and none of us had an issue. Nor did any of the other 5 people on your team.
3. Don't attempt to invent phantom tpg rules, act incredibly rude and then expect to get what you want.
4. We are very understanding and accommodating if you come to us ahead of time. Just last week we agreed to play a match at 3pm est against Jims so that one of their players could play.

1. 130? Please. I wish I was pinging 130. I saw my ping at 80 for 2 mins in the second half, and then what do you know - net graph was at the lowest of ~170-180 the rest of the match. I'd have been happy with 130.

2. My INTERNET and the routing from my area to Colorado are two different things. I have zero problems on anything but your server. This isn't the first time I've played on your server, and I knew it was going to be bad going into it. Which is why I tried to get us another server to play on prior to match time.

3. Invent tpg rules? You're sitting here telling me you've never switched servers at half when the other team has wanted to? In 10 years? I 100% know for a fact that I have. We weren't inventing anything. But hey gwolf, thanks for coming into our vent and lecturing us on them. If you hadn't come and read rule 5.1.2a to us over vent, I'd have never believed you!

4. We didn't have any other options until an hour prior to the match. And guess who wasn't cool with playing in the server when I joined up, said 'wow I have really high ping to this, would you guys care if we played on the chi we just bought?' All but ignored me. Classy. As. ****.

Yeah, the server is terrible. You guys would've totally won if we used your server for the second half...

Unlike you, child, I don't really care about winning much in this game; but who doesn't want to win? Obviously our server would have proven better in attempt to succeed at that goal. I know I am bad, I just enjoy playing. Unfortunately I still have to play against people like you.

mare wrote:

Unlike you, child, I don't really care about winning much in this game; but who doesn't want to win? Obviously our server would have proven better in attempt to succeed at that goal. I know I am bad, I just enjoy playing. Unfortunately I still have to play against people like you.

Originally I wasn't going to post to any of this because I really don't care that much. HOWEVER, was randomly skimming over your long-winded diatribe and noticed you called me a "child," to which I say, let that foam battle-axe swing with extra vigor this weekend. Sounds like you got alot of nerd-rage to let out.

ohhhhbeeee wrote:obviously we're going to make fun of the nerdy sounding kid that walks in reading rules from the tpg handbook.

JamesDecker wrote:Because if we were switching servers we needed the information to do said change.

kngz` wrote:because we don't have to do it if we don't want to?