Nineteen Eleven

hahaha sears avi is great

Sears wrote:what movie is that from?

Stephen King's "IT".

Has any stephen king movie ever been good in the history of ever?

This thread needs more of hXc defending the accused... (or in this case, the banned)

seaN wrote:This thread needs more of hXc defending the accused... (or in this case, the banned)

He already brought up his history of defending Stamp.

Show of hands, who is surprised by that?

*Crickets*

Thought so.

Still....

seaN wrote:needs more

seaN wrote:Still....

seaN wrote:needs more

Rambizzle wrote:

seaN wrote:Still....

seaN wrote:needs more

dorraj wrote:

Marshall_D wrote:i feel this need to call jarrod fat and ugly. please explain

You mad, ****? I feel the need to call*. You're stupid, eh?

Seems obvious to me. Personal vendentta or not I'd still like to see TPG release demos of people they ban. There have been questionable bans before.. In CAL and TPG.

The ac admins should never have to disclose evidence or how they came to their conclusion. The community and league has already appointed them and trusted their knowledge and expirence of the game.

Auditors don't lay every thing out when they uncover fraud. That's a good recipe for people to understand your processes....and if they understand what you look for, and how, then they can come up with better ways to get around you. Another reason is there's still other open cases. You don't want to alert and tip off people. You want them to coninue so they dig their own grave.

But there really isn't anything stopping the individual who was banned from releasing their demos and helping them in the court of public opinion.