Nineteen Eleven

alex kirk wrote:

Charr wrote:Tell you what. You explain how it matters, and I'll check the SS. I was actually referring to that case as one that the admins handled correctly. I'm a little curious why you'd bring that one up?

Really? So in one match you lose by less than 10, and in another you lose by 100, and you want me to explain the significance? You want me to tell you how these cases are different?

Are you **** stupid?

**** wrote:Guessing Char is Kyle Allaire.

Kid gets shit on by everyone who plays him, can see why he would dispute over something as stupid as rates.

alex kirk wrote:

Charr wrote:Hmm? The one where we both received an FF loss, they had someone cheating. We disputed. for whatever reason, they received 0 points. Our backup player was rating. Everyone on our team thought we should have won. I checked the rules, and said we both should get an FF loss. Sure enough, that's what happened. It was a complex case as far as disputes go...Yet when simple rating disputes arise, there are so many "variables" as you call them, that need to be taken into account. Legit as my shit.

They didn't have someone cheating for sure, he just didn't record one half.

You're escaping my point, which is funny to see. Don't squirm from the truth, bro. You lost a match by an unbelievably narrow margin and STILL broke the rules, thus got your FF loss. Whereas vs. MVPz you lost by a much larger margin (2 caps...). And you think these two cases are able to be judged THE SAME?

Seriously. SERIOUSLY. THIS is why TPG has the rule where admins treat each case individually, because of idiots like you who interpret every case as being equal. These cases are anything but equal. There are serious inconsistencies between them.

Charr wrote:

alex kirk wrote:

Charr wrote:Hmm? The one where we both received an FF loss, they had someone cheating. We disputed. for whatever reason, they received 0 points. Our backup player was rating. Everyone on our team thought we should have won. I checked the rules, and said we both should get an FF loss. Sure enough, that's what happened. It was a complex case as far as disputes go...Yet when simple rating disputes arise, there are so many "variables" as you call them, that need to be taken into account. Legit as my shit.

They didn't have someone cheating for sure, he just didn't record one half.

You're escaping my point, which is funny to see. Don't squirm from the truth, bro. You lost a match by an unbelievably narrow margin and STILL broke the rules, thus got your FF loss. Whereas vs. MVPz you lost by a much larger margin (2 caps...). And you think these two cases are able to be judged THE SAME?

Seriously. SERIOUSLY. THIS is why TPG has the rule where admins treat each case individually, because of idiots like you who interpret every case as being equal. These cases are anything but equal. There are serious inconsistencies between them.

You're escaping my point. The rules are very clear on what happens when you rate. These rules were not upheld. Why would TPG be taken seriously if they can simply change each rule whenever they please? Your argument is completely unrealistic and is off-topic really.

**** wrote:WOOOOOOOOOOOOO

why was my rep reset to -50....I would like my three red boxes back.

Signed,
Red4lyfe gaming syndicate.

dorraj wrote:

Charr wrote:

alex kirk wrote: They didn't have someone cheating for sure, he just didn't record one half.

You're escaping my point, which is funny to see. Don't squirm from the truth, bro. You lost a match by an unbelievably narrow margin and STILL broke the rules, thus got your FF loss. Whereas vs. MVPz you lost by a much larger margin (2 caps...). And you think these two cases are able to be judged THE SAME?

Seriously. SERIOUSLY. THIS is why TPG has the rule where admins treat each case individually, because of idiots like you who interpret every case as being equal. These cases are anything but equal. There are serious inconsistencies between them.

You're escaping my point. The rules are very clear on what happens when you rate. These rules were not upheld. Why would TPG be taken seriously if they can simply change each rule whenever they please? Your argument is completely unrealistic and is off-topic really.

HOLD UP, TPG IS TAKEN SERIOUSLY? News to me!

Charr wrote:You're escaping my point. The rules are very clear on what happens when you rate. These rules were not upheld. Why would TPG be taken seriously if they can simply change each rule whenever they please? Your argument is completely unrealistic and is off-topic really.

alex kirk wrote:

Charr wrote:You're escaping my point. The rules are very clear on what happens when you rate. These rules were not upheld. Why would TPG be taken seriously if they can simply change each rule whenever they please? Your argument is completely unrealistic and is off-topic really.

Oh. My. ****. Goodness.

1) Admins have the right to treat each case independently even when it goes against the "default" ruling. THIS RULE IS ABOVE THE "DEFAULT" RULE REGARDING RATING.
2) When two cases are different, they will be treated differently.
3) Your first FF loss =/= your FF loss against MVPz. THERE WERE DIFFERENT ****.
4) THUS, different treatments regarding these two DIFFERENT rating infractions.

Are you really not picking this shit up? This is so **** elementary it hurts. It's more elementary than jules winnfield's sacked lunch.