Nineteen Eleven

i wouldnt mind consistently neg repping all of the dod source players posts on 1911 for playing a dumb game , would be fun!

greetz wrote:i wouldnt mind consistently neg repping all of the dod source players posts on 1911 for playing a dumb game , would be fun!

yup, i wouldnt mind them on the forums as long as they couldnt have rep power ever.

If we move forward with any plans to have Source on 1911, we'll have a poll open so people can vote. I'm not going to open it up if its just going to be a huge flame fest.

Sears wrote:If we move forward with any plans to have Source on 1911, we'll have a poll open so people can vote. I'm not going to open it up if its just going to be a huge flame fest.

what on 1911 isn't a huge flame fest? That is the true question.

Sears wrote:If we move forward with any plans to have Source on 1911, we'll have a poll open so people can vote. I'm not going to open it up if its just going to be a huge flame fest.

Sears wrote:

WHAT THE ****. Did that dude die???

Why would anyone want to talk about that stupid game? Nothing's stopping them from talking about random shit and DoD.

Source has been falling apart first because the game is frustrating to play, and second because the community they had (and maybe still have on a much smaller scale?) was pretty awful. The only benefit in adding the community here would be added traffic to the site (is it needed?).

Source blows but what's the harm in letting them have their own sub-forum or something. Throw in another TPG division, give one or two of them admin control over it, and let it flourish or fail.

Seems like a low cost-high benefit situation. If the Source kids **** up the opportunity, then it's no loss to Sears or Narc or anyone in 1.3. If they make the most of it, the communities are both a little bit stronger by way of combining community and competitive hubs.

on Gotfrag everyone was just flaming eachothers forum back and forth lol.