Talent., by motiv

[cassinoroyale]

Movie is swagnificent.420

[Todo]

Dear god, i assume the title has nothing to do with the bands you used

and

Really enjoyed this one. That shot on poo56 on rr2 coming from balcony was nasty. Good job dude.

Well done though. Your scoped flick shots are on another level.

[mike]

Loads of **** talent...

[rolyat]

Haven't seen a good sniper movie in a while.. Great job Chuck

[dogfire]

Very good work, awesome movie!

I do have a question though. Is there any particular reason why most dod movie makers don't render their movies in any resolution above 1280x720? My first thought was that the render time compared to the increase in quality was not worth it but I'll let the experts set the record straight. Just curious.

[Shoolta]

great movie mv!!! congrts!!!

[mexicant]

I was killed 0 times in this movie. Not impressed. Please go outside.

[mike]

Very good work, awesome movie!

I do have a question though. Is there any particular reason why most dod movie makers don't render their movies in any resolution above 1280x720? My first thought was that the render time compared to the increase in quality was not worth it but I'll let the experts set the record straight. Just curious.

I think it's due to HD space and the time it takes to render the movie. Rendering a movie in 1080p takes much longer compared to rendering it in 720p.

[motive]

Thanks everyone for saying nice things <3

Very good work, awesome movie!

I do have a question though. Is there any particular reason why most dod movie makers don't render their movies in any resolution above 1280x720? My first thought was that the render time compared to the increase in quality was not worth it but I'll let the experts set the record straight. Just curious.

I think it's due to HD space and the time it takes to render the movie. Rendering a movie in 1080p takes much longer compared to rendering it in 720p.

HD space definitely plays a part. I captured around 700GB of video data for this. Rendering time shouldn't really be a limiting factor though; these videos are not very complex. I was able to render the whole thing with two-pass encoding during the course of a single scrim. I'd be surprised if it took much longer for a 1080p video.

I think it's mostly a filesize vs. quality balance. I wanted the video to have a high enough bitrate to eliminate any pixelation or distortion but keep the final filesize small enough to stop people from bitching about it.

[JaGGoNdd]

everything everyone has said about the resolution is the truth. DOWNLOADING NOW CHUCK. you switch songs ?! WILL BE IMPRESSED REGARDLESS.