Page 3 of 13

Re: DoD Draft: List of players

Posted: Thu Jul 07, 2011 12:26 pm
by nugz`
rifle/3rd rifle

Re: DoD Draft: List of players

Posted: Thu Jul 07, 2011 12:27 pm
by ohhhhbeeee
**** you, ****.

i said any!!!!!!!!!!

actually. put me down for anything other than the heavy.

Re: DoD Draft: List of players

Posted: Thu Jul 07, 2011 12:32 pm
by likwid
Rifle/Third

I HAVE TO PRONE TO USE ANY OTHER WEAPONS.

Re: DoD Draft: List of players

Posted: Thu Jul 07, 2011 12:34 pm
by joeledmunds
I can snipe as well.

Re: DoD Draft: List of players

Posted: Thu Jul 07, 2011 12:35 pm
by Bromley
Would rather rifle but will play any class!

Re: DoD Draft: List of players

Posted: Thu Jul 07, 2011 1:18 pm
by kirk
Just a heads up, you guys might be wasting your time with this. Not saying this to be negative or discouraging, but something may already be in the works along the lines of what you're trying to be setting up here.

Re: DoD Draft: List of players

Posted: Thu Jul 07, 2011 1:32 pm
by ryanemo
if that's the case who cares, all we've done is make a thread to get a list of players interested in a non-profitable fun gigantic 12man tourny and start thinking of a possible date to play it. lol, not exactly time consuming. i'm sure if something else came up that was more organized/taken care of and whatnot, people wouldn't mind just dropping this and going with that. if there's something else in the works along these lines, then how about we just have this going as a 'just in case'.

Re: DoD Draft: List of players

Posted: Thu Jul 07, 2011 1:33 pm
by greetz
Greetz:Rifle (Sniper/[Heavy])

Re: DoD Draft: List of players

Posted: Thu Jul 07, 2011 1:43 pm
by Polak
i love how this is my idea and im not put on the list. rifle or heavy who cares

Re: DoD Draft: List of players

Posted: Thu Jul 07, 2011 1:54 pm
by Airnick15
ryanemo wrote:if that's the case who cares, all we've done is make a thread to get a list of players interested in a non-profitable fun gigantic 12man tourny and start thinking of a possible date to play it. lol, not exactly time consuming. i'm sure if something else came up that was more organized/taken care of and whatnot, people wouldn't mind just dropping this and going with that. if there's something else in the works along these lines, then how about we just have this going as a 'just in case'.
+1