Page 21 of 34
Re: dear MVP
Posted: Wed Nov 02, 2011 3:06 am
by kirk
Charr wrote:There is no reason to treat them differently. Simply referring to the rules would suffice in both cases. It's so elementary it **** hurts. How many times do I need to say it? The **** are exactly the same. Someone. Rated. **** right over your head.
Right. One match, in regular season, you lose by a very small margin, had someone rating, and thus still ended up losing the match.
In another, in playoffs, you lose by 2+ caps, that team had someone rating, and thus a rematch is proposed.
To say the **** are exactly the same
is objectively wrong. You can plug your ears and shout, "RATES! RATES!" all you want, but there ARE different **** that you are simply REFUSING to acknowledge. It's not that they don't exist; it's that you aren't acknowledging them when they are right there.
Is there a difference between losing by 2 points vs. 100 points? Simple yes or no should work.
Re: dear MVP
Posted: Wed Nov 02, 2011 3:06 am
by toxinatoR
dorraj wrote:Jesus **** christ, I have a headache just from reading all this shit, Char. Clearly you're a retarded shitty gay pathetic **** sucking **** **** shitty **** piece of shit homo douche bag moronic loser **** smelling hot dog eating **** shitty gay pathetic **** sucking **** **** shitty **** piece of shit homo douche bag moronic loser **** smelling hot dog eating **** shitty gay pathetic **** sucking **** **** shitty **** piece of shit homo douche bag moronic loser **** smelling hot dog eating **** shitty gay pathetic **** sucking **** **** shitty **** piece of shit homo douche bag moronic loser **** smelling hot dog eating **** shitty gay pathetic **** sucking **** **** shitty **** piece of shit homo douche bag moronic loser **** smelling hot dog eating **** shitty gay pathetic **** sucking **** **** shitty **** piece of shit homo douche bag moronic loser **** smelling hot dog eating **** shitty gay pathetic **** sucking **** **** shitty **** piece of shit homo douche bag moronic loser **** smelling hot dog eating **** shitty gay pathetic **** sucking **** **** shitty **** piece of shit homo douche bag moronic loser **** smelling hot dog eating **** shitty gay pathetic **** sucking **** **** shitty **** piece of shit homo douche bag moronic loser **** smelling hot dog eating **** idiot.
I'm not really a mean person, you just make me angry.
Re: dear MVP
Posted: Wed Nov 02, 2011 3:09 am
by Charr
alex kirk wrote:Charr wrote:There is no reason to treat them differently. Simply referring to the rules would suffice in both cases. It's so elementary it **** hurts. How many times do I need to say it? The **** are exactly the same. Someone. Rated. **** right over your head.
Right. One match, in regular season, you lose by a very small margin, had someone rating, and thus still ended up losing the match.
In another, in playoffs, you lose by 2+ caps, that team had someone rating, and thus a rematch is proposed.
To say the **** are exactly the same
is objectively wrong. You can plug your ears and shout, "RATES! RATES!" all you want, but there ARE different **** that you are simply REFUSING to acknowledge. It's not that they don't exist; it's that you aren't acknowledging them when they are right there.
Is there a difference between losing by 2 points vs. 100 points? Simple yes or no should work.
huh? Is there a difference between two different players rating? One had 7500, the other had 7500. One was on our team, one was on an admin's team. Hmm.. See where I'm going with this? The admin who handled the first case
FOLLOWED THE RULES EXACTLY. The admin who handled the second case
IGNORED THE RULES COMPLETELY. Done being confused? k.
Re: dear MVP
Posted: Wed Nov 02, 2011 3:11 am
by kirk
Charr wrote:huh? Is there a difference between two different players rating? One had 7500, the other had 7500. One was on our team, one was on an admin's team. Hmm.. See where I'm going with this? The admin who handled the first case FOLLOWED THE RULES EXACTLY. The admin who handled the second case IGNORED THE RULES COMPLETELY. Done being confused? k.
And you completely overlook all the **** associated with each case. Like how in one match, the loss margin was significantly smaller AND you still had someone rating. In the other, you lost by 2+ caps and the other team had someone rating.
Do you acknowledge this? Because I'm getting sick of running intellectual circles around you.
Please respond.
Re: dear MVP
Posted: Wed Nov 02, 2011 3:13 am
by Charr
alex kirk wrote:Charr wrote:huh? Is there a difference between two different players rating? One had 7500, the other had 7500. One was on our team, one was on an admin's team. Hmm.. See where I'm going with this? The admin who handled the first case FOLLOWED THE RULES EXACTLY. The admin who handled the second case IGNORED THE RULES COMPLETELY. Done being confused? k.
And you completely overlook all the **** associated with each case. Like how in one match, the loss margin was significantly smaller AND you still had someone rating. In the other, you lost by 2+ caps and the other team had someone rating.
Do you acknowledge this? Because I'm getting sick of running intellectual circles around you.
Please respond.
The admin who handled the first case
FOLLOWED THE RULES EXACTLY. The admin who handled the second case
IGNORED THE RULES COMPLETELY. Done being confused? k. <- that is my entire argument. You will either respond to that, or not at all. I'm done stomping on your confused, delusional brain.
Re: dear MVP
Posted: Wed Nov 02, 2011 3:15 am
by kirk
Charr wrote:The admin who handled the first case FOLLOWED THE RULES EXACTLY. The admin who handled the second case IGNORED THE RULES COMPLETELY. Done being confused? k. <- that is my entire argument. You will either respond to that, or not at all. I'm done stomping on your confused, delusional brain.
Funny how
no one, not even your own team agrees with you.
And funny how you conveniently overlook the rule that states TPG admins treat each case individually. In both cases admins FOLLOWED THE RULES EXACTLY BECAUSE ALL ACTIONS TAKEN WERE WITHIN THE CONFINES OF THE TPG SET OF RULES.
2ez.
Re: dear MVP
Posted: Wed Nov 02, 2011 3:19 am
by Charr
alex kirk wrote:Charr wrote:The admin who handled the first case FOLLOWED THE RULES EXACTLY. The admin who handled the second case IGNORED THE RULES COMPLETELY. Done being confused? k. <- that is my entire argument. You will either respond to that, or not at all. I'm done stomping on your confused, delusional brain.
Funny how
no one, not even your own team agrees with you.
And funny how you conveniently overlook the rule that states TPG admins treat each case individually. In both cases admins FOLLOWED THE RULES EXACTLY BECAUSE ALL ACTIONS TAKEN WERE WITHIN THE CONFINES OF THE TPG SET OF RULES.
2ez.
The rules aren't guidelines or suggestions. They are rules. Also, the part about admins handling each case individually sort of implies that they will do so under complicated scenarios. I thought it to be painfully obvious, but since you keep insisting that it is something completely different, I must inform you of your misinterpretation. Again. This must be a severe condition you have. It seems to get worse as you get angrier and angrier. Never understanding anything. Must be a tough life.
Edit : I must now declare that your argument is not only crippled, but boring. Please send someone else to take your place, or go away completely.
Re: dear MVP
Posted: Wed Nov 02, 2011 3:21 am
by kirk
Charr wrote:The rules aren't guidelines or suggestions. They are rules. Also, the part about admins handling each case individually sort of implies that they will do so under complicated scenarios. I thought it to be painfully obvious, but since you keep insisting that it is something completely different, I must inform you of your misinterpretation. Again. This must be a severe condition you have. It seems to get worse as your get angrier and angrier. Never understanding anything. Must be a tough life.
Angry? We're in vent laughing at you. People from YOUR TEAM have PMed some of us telling us how much they disagree with you. Get ready for the snip snip, brah. I'd be surprised if you aren't cut soon for being such an embarrassment to your comrades.
You have yet to acknowledge the drastic difference between losing a match by a narrow margin and losing by 2 caps. But sure, keep living in your delusional world that there are no differences between these scenarios.
Do you regret dropping out of high school?
Re: dear MVP
Posted: Wed Nov 02, 2011 3:23 am
by squatta_leader
Charr wrote:Never understanding anything. Must be a tough life.
Re: dear MVP
Posted: Wed Nov 02, 2011 3:24 am
by CharlieGiteau
So my phone burst into flames trying to keep up with this thread. Attempted to post on page 8, but my phone said "Cannot compute.". So now it's page 9 and my other post never made it in. All I want to do is post in this damn epic thread! By the time this gets through, I'm expecting page 11 or 12...
You better forever archive this Eric, or we'll all neg rep your ass! I think my 5 year old could understand the LOGIC behind the admins decision. Char, "you a dumbass..."