Re: STAMPERS DOWN
Posted: Thu Feb 09, 2012 4:27 pm
I could probably get it banned but I dont care to..
reps before neg: -940
reps after neg: -1002
choooooo choooooooo
Nineteen Eleven
Relax, lounge around, and find out who hacks.
https://forums.nineteeneleven.gg/
STAMPERS DOWN
Page 23 of 39
Re: STAMPERS DOWN
Posted: Thu Feb 09, 2012 4:28 pm
alex kirk's chuck taylors are going viral
reps before neg: -940
reps after neg: -1002
choooooo choooooooo
reps before neg: -940
reps after neg: -1002
choooooo choooooooo
Re: STAMPERS DOWN
Posted: Thu Feb 09, 2012 4:38 pm
Should hit that 135 pound milestone any day now, eh brah?Black Hawk wrote:Defrag stop being the TPG bitch, you sound like a little suck up. And nooo, Stamp is the meat head. I bench well but im not gunna brag about it with my e-buddies
Re: STAMPERS DOWN
Posted: Thu Feb 09, 2012 5:19 pm
I'm sorry for cheating bros and hoes. I'll be back with NO CHEATS. But until then, see you ladies in pubs.
Re: STAMPERS DOWN
Posted: Thu Feb 09, 2012 5:20 pm
So this is where the internet is won and I never read another post again.Rambizzle wrote:alex kirk wrote: Seriously, why? Rationalize this gif for me.
Re: STAMPERS DOWN
Posted: Thu Feb 09, 2012 5:26 pm
Alex Kirk I bench 170. Want a video?
Re: STAMPERS DOWN
Posted: Thu Feb 09, 2012 5:31 pm
If you want, but I don't find that too hard to believe. Especially if you're talking about maxing out.Stamp wrote:Alex Kirk I bench 170. Want a video?
Re: STAMPERS DOWN
Posted: Thu Feb 09, 2012 5:33 pm
I wanted 200 but for some reason everything felt heavier this week.
Re: STAMPERS DOWN
Posted: Thu Feb 09, 2012 5:34 pm
Probably diet and your coach having you do 492 sets per week. Might have something to do with it.Stamp wrote:I wanted 200 but for some reason everything felt heavier this week.
Re: STAMPERS DOWN
Posted: Thu Feb 09, 2012 5:43 pm
lol this.alex kirk wrote:Probably diet and your coach having you do 492 sets per week. Might have something to do with it.Stamp wrote:I wanted 200 but for some reason everything felt heavier this week.