Re: dear MVP
Posted: Wed Nov 02, 2011 4:09 am
dorraj wrote:Hey you ****, stop whining about the rates. Where the **** are you... let's fight on the internet!
Nineteen Eleven
Relax, lounge around, and find out who hacks.
https://forums.nineteeneleven.gg/
dear MVP
Page 24 of 34
Re: dear MVP
Posted: Wed Nov 02, 2011 6:57 am
I spent the last 20 minutes reading this thread, it delivered.
Re: dear MVP
Posted: Wed Nov 02, 2011 7:12 am
This thing really took off when I went to sleep. Char, you really are a **** idiot.
Sears, I need god neg repping status. I can't do it anymore. Please fix.
Char, you are making the same point over and over. Which by the way is invalid.
Passing your basics class at ECPI doesn't count as being college educated by the way...
Sears, I need god neg repping status. I can't do it anymore. Please fix.
Char, you are making the same point over and over. Which by the way is invalid.
Passing your basics class at ECPI doesn't count as being college educated by the way...
Re: dear MVP
Posted: Wed Nov 02, 2011 7:59 am
This makes me sad and angry.alex kirk wrote:Basically this whole case sounds like Bayside High's ordeal at CPL 2005.
Re: dear MVP
Posted: Wed Nov 02, 2011 8:42 am
Skipping ahead 4 pages in this reading marathon to say: Everything Alex has said not only makes sense, but is completely right. You're just wrong and to try and defend yourself, you repeat everything you've already said.Charr wrote:You should at least get your facts straight before storming in here like a 6 year old on a sugar high, making little to no sense at all. You just seem to skim through things and misinterpret nearly everything that is right in front of your face. Very tragic if you have this disability in the real world.
You sniped against mpvz, right? All I have to say is: Please snipe in the finals. Please.
Re: dear MVP
Posted: Wed Nov 02, 2011 9:28 am
Just logged in to say great **** thread 
Re: dear MVP
Posted: Wed Nov 02, 2011 9:36 am
OMFG. I'm french so I dont read english as fast as you guys and i sppent the last 30min reading this. CARE-O-METER IS AT ITS TOP. Great **** read. And I'll remember forever the day that you said you had no respect for me Narc. Marked on my calendar forever 
Re: dear MVP
Posted: Wed Nov 02, 2011 10:38 am
From what I have gathered:
Taylu_b was originally going to dispute and get the FF Win.
After reconsideration he decided just to let the match go.
TPG Admin ( Tox ) intervenes and suggests they do a rematch instead of just letting it go.
Things get blown out of proportion on the forums.
Char spews out 5 pages of trolling.
Narc decides to just let Mindflow have the FF Win to end this madness
Char still spews out more trolling and complaining even though he got what he wanted
Page 10.
Taylu_b was originally going to dispute and get the FF Win.
After reconsideration he decided just to let the match go.
TPG Admin ( Tox ) intervenes and suggests they do a rematch instead of just letting it go.
Things get blown out of proportion on the forums.
Char spews out 5 pages of trolling.
Narc decides to just let Mindflow have the FF Win to end this madness
Char still spews out more trolling and complaining even though he got what he wanted
Page 10.
Re: dear MVP
Posted: Wed Nov 02, 2011 10:39 am
Illegal rates:
Players may not go below the minimum approved values. Failure to do so will result in that player's team will be awarded 0 points per half;one player rating, first half 0 points, two players rating, first and second half 0 points and a minimum one game suspension.
TPG admins will review each case separately and determine what, if any, remedy is required for each situation.
For someone that is so dead set on following the rules to the "t" you really stopped reading that rule, because in the same rule that you are using as a basis for your argument also has a second part to the rule. The same person that wrote that rule also added that rule. Why is that? Maybe because they know every online dispute will be alittle different. Thus causing the addition to that rule. You can sit here and call it corrupt but, I as with most call it a tpg admin reviewing each case separately and determine what, if any, remedy is required for each situation.
Players may not go below the minimum approved values. Failure to do so will result in that player's team will be awarded 0 points per half;one player rating, first half 0 points, two players rating, first and second half 0 points and a minimum one game suspension.
TPG admins will review each case separately and determine what, if any, remedy is required for each situation.
For someone that is so dead set on following the rules to the "t" you really stopped reading that rule, because in the same rule that you are using as a basis for your argument also has a second part to the rule. The same person that wrote that rule also added that rule. Why is that? Maybe because they know every online dispute will be alittle different. Thus causing the addition to that rule. You can sit here and call it corrupt but, I as with most call it a tpg admin reviewing each case separately and determine what, if any, remedy is required for each situation.