Agree with what? 4chan being the most reliable source of information "evar" or the content of what was posted?alex kirk wrote:I hope you don't agree with this, Andy.aLpha.cn-[tang] wrote:4chan: probably most reliable source of information evar.
If the former, obviously not and I hope you can detect the sarcasm.
If the latter, I just copypasted what was on 4chan. Obviously, what that says may not and probably doesn't reflect the reality of the situation, but that post has a point and I do agree with parts of it. I won't delve too deep into this debate since I don't know to which you were referring.
Actually, I'm pretty sure it is a crime--or at least can be interpreted as one. Children taking pictures of themselves nude and sending them to others can be construed as producing and distributing child pornography and I'm pretty sure some kids are actually registered sex offenders as a result, sadly. There's a lot of debate about the sex offender registry as there isn't really a distinction between the severity of offenses.alex kirk wrote:Nope, I don't think so, actually.SKiNnTo wrote:Yup she was a child which means, she put child porn on the web. Is it a crime if a minor sends nudes to a minor?
See: http://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/21/us/21 ... d=all&_r=0
First Google search result. Research further if you're remotely interested.